Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 5241 - 5260
of 13,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 7:36 pm
(See, e.g., Allison v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:57 am
For what it’s worth there are some great books for the beginning STATA user - they’re kind of like the Emanuel’s law outlines of statistics. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:50 am
Too many people still think they’re “completely fine to drive” when they’ve had a few too many. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:25 am
In the meantime, entities must still consider compliance issues surrounding the noteworthy Illinois biometric privacy law (the Biometric Information Privacy Act, or BIPA) enacted in 2008 and now the subject of much recent litigation, including: In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litig., No. 15-03747 (N.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:54 am
(See HealthBlawg post re: recent related GAO report and industry response.) [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
This is a well-known and long-standing phenomenon; see, e.g., the flap over GeoCities' user agreement from a decade ago. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
I would definitely cite Net MoneyIn or In re Arkley when making this argument. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
(I'm not necessarily blaming the Court of Appeal in this regard; if you're not going to change the opinion, there's no reason to delay its publication merely to make it less obvious that oral argument didn't matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:43 pm
Perhaps what we're really doing is confirming our biases. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 7:05 am
This is the most risky option because if you're not the one making the payment, your credit is truly vulnerable. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:42 pm
See, for instance, the SDNY decision in In re: Copper Market Antitrust Litig., 200F.R.D. 213, 220-21 (S.D.N.Y. 2001), in which the court granted work product immunity to materials created in anticipation of litigation by an outside PR firm. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:02 am
Of course, the fact that “dark patterns” aren’t new at the FTC doesn’t mean they’re not important. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
In this respect, the CRTC chief also discussed the fact that the new law also includes changes to the Competition Act (e.g., prohibiting certain additional online or e-mail related false or misleading claims – e.g., in headers, URLs, the body of electronic communications, etc.) and will also have privacy law related implications, including a prohibition on online address harvesting without permission. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
We also suggest that stations adopt written contracts, as these contracts can cover issues that are important to broadcasters, e.g. indemnifications from advertisers that they have the rights to all the music and other material used in their ads, statements that the broadcaster reserves the right to preempt ads if they don't like the content or if the broadcaster needs to run something more important, that advertising sold to one party should not be re-sold to… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:54 am
Lawyers must constantly re-evaluate law, case, and risk level of current process. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:35 am
Leech, 1993) as well as qualitative academic studies of crime (e.g. [read post]
18 May 2007, 7:13 am
Michael Hull (U of T) made a very interesting contribution included how American citizens (ordinary people) love the idea of ‘freedom’ and therefore are very interested (e.g. in Psiphon etc), more so than anywhere else. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am
See, e.g., Luna v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:59 am
They’re really pretty machines; the operating system seemed enjoyable to use; I wasn’t liking the new Windows operating system. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
We’re rolling along, but where will we end up? [read post]
