Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Unicolors v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:22 am
An appellate ruling earlier this month in Herbert v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
Prior to this point, s68 prohibited the unregistered exclusive licence holder from being awarded "damages or an account of profits" rather than "costs or expenses". [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:44 am
By Danielle Kays and James Nasiri Seyfarth Synopsis: In February 2023, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in Cothron v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm
Gray v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
Drugs in the less restrictive schedules include cocaine, methamphetamine (“meth”), and phencyclidine (“PCP” or “angel dust”) (all Schedule II), and opium (Schedule V). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
Drugs in the less restrictive schedules include cocaine, methamphetamine (“meth”), and phencyclidine (“PCP” or “angel dust”) (all Schedule II), and opium (Schedule V). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Saint-Gobain manufacturers such crystals under a license with another patent holder. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Lee Tawes III v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 3:16 am
Time will tell if a referral will eventually be made in one of the next FRAND cases dealt with by the UPC (or a national court in an EU member state). (*) Cases n. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
Chambers); and Tetz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 7:06 pm
See, e.g., Corwin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
Noting the recent K-Dur decision, the brief goes on to argue that “California law does not permit a patent holder to exclude competition with a naked cash payment so large it casts serious doubt on the patent’s legal ability to exclude. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
” While the Abdullahi v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am
In the 2014 case of Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
” While the Abdullahi v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
AG Holder: Assassination is unlawful. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:22 pm
A state law claim is preempted by the Act when (1) the work at issue comes within the subject matter of copyright, and (2) the rights granted by state law are equivalent to the exclusive rights of copyright holders under section 106 of the Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The forum-shopping that has resulted after Chau Chak Wing v Fairfax substantially allowed plaintiffs to evade defendants’ right to a jury trial in several states. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:58 pm
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
