Search for: "Doe 3" Results 5281 - 5300 of 192,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Daniel Cappetta
L. c. 211E, §3(e), does not “authorize[] a sentencing judge to depart from the mandatory minimum terms specified by statute for subsequent drug offenses,” where “the Legislature has not yet enacted into law sentencing guidelines recommended by the Massachusetts Sentencing Commission. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Daniel Cappetta
L. c. 211E, §3(e), does not “authorize[] a sentencing judge to depart from the mandatory minimum terms specified by statute for subsequent drug offenses,” where “the Legislature has not yet enacted into law sentencing guidelines recommended by the Massachusetts Sentencing Commission. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
We will likely never know, but that fact, which heightens the poignancy of McCorvey’s personal story, does not undermine the authority of the case that bears her pseudonym.Consider another landmark case, Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:33 pm
HuffPo does note, as I did the other day, that he made “a smattering” of contributions to Republicans as well. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:50 pm by Ann Althouse
“IT DOES NOT SERVE THE UNION’S INTERESTS when the union loses some of its power and things don’t seem to get worse for teachers as a result. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Collins, a 6–3 majority concluded that evidence of actual innocence was “not relevant” in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “absent some [other] constitutional violation. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:08 pm by Dan Flynn
The civil action also names John Does 1-3 to eventually rope in defendants “whose identifies and citizenship are presently unkown,” but who “were involved in the manufacture, distribution, and/or sales that caused Plaintiffs’ associated injuries. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm by John Elwood
  The Court held by a 5–3 vote (with Justice Sotomayor recusing herself), along the familiar ideological lines, that the Federal Arbitration Act does not permit imposition of class arbitration on parties who have not agreed to authorize class arbitration. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:14 pm by AdamSmith1776
Every country does everything it can to claw its way back from a deep financial crisis. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor Law New York City Tr. [read post]