Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 5281 - 5300 of 8,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Fiona de Londras
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm by Tejinder Singh
Static Control Components, in which it will consider who has the right to bring a false advertising claim under the federal Lanham Act; and United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
United States Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard Law School professor, sued The New York Times for defamation for falsely sugges [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
United States will be heard on the last day of scheduled arguments this term, and the Court is expected to issue its final decisions for the current term in late June. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
Public's Right of AccessThe intersection of these competing issues is the subject of a notable decision by Judge Chin on the disclosure of victims' emails he received prior to Madoff's guilty plea, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his "opportunity to be heard," contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Music and Copyright IPKat provides a summary of the three cases brought in the United States claiming that the song Thinking Out Loud performed by Ed Sheeran, copied Let’s Get It On performed by Marvin Gaye. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm by Juliette Passer, Esq.
  Federal and State LawsIn the United States, the United States Arbitration Act (Pub.L. 68–401, 43 Stat. 883, enacted February 12, 1925) (FAA) governs international arbitrations. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Russell Spivak
Rumsfeld (in which a plurality held that detention was subject to due process concerns, including notice, counsel, and an opportunity to be heard), and Boumediene v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Patricia’s daughter continues in her declaration to state what anyone would have to agree is the obvious. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On 12 and 13 February 2018 Sir David Eady heard the trial in the case of AXB v BXA. [read post]