Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 17,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2024, 6:56 am
When it comes to its reasoning, SBA stated: “SBA does not believe that the 35% HUBZone residency requirement should be watered down to as low as 20% over the course of a firm’s participation in the HUBZone program merely because a HUBZone small business concern received one or more HUBZone contracts. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 12:20 pm
In particular, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:19 pm
35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:40 pm
But the Federal Circuit held that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:01 am
As the test mentioned in point 2.1.3 above is fulfilled, not specifying the material of the tubular element 32 in claim 1 does not offend against A 123(2). [read post]
7 May 2011, 6:00 am
Shay, 35. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
RE 41,571 (“the ‘571 patent”), a method-of-use patent listed in the Orange Book covering BUTRANS (buprenorphine) Transdermal System is not eligible for a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) because the product does not meet the first permitted commercial marketing prong of the PTE statute at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
Since there was no valid approval, there was no valid notice of exemption and the 35-day statute of limitations did not begin to run. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
It does better in lower light. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm
However, as the court pointed out, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 7:33 pm
I might ask, if an AI is not an individual, does that mean it is a collective? [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:06 pm
Patent No. 9,108,973 under 35 U.S.C. 156. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:01 am
The nation does not need more of the same. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
Cir. 1996) which held that violation of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
Count 35 of the indictment charges Alexander with aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:17 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
Since there was no valid approval, there was no valid notice of exemption and the 35-day statute of limitations did not begin to run. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
