Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 5301 - 5320 of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
And, had the balance of the account stayed at $4000, either by means of additional purchases or if the account holder paid only enough to cover accrued interest, Dell would receive approximately $1120 per year in interest alone. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm by Florian Mueller
Critics of the ITC have warned all along that this trade agency with quasijudicial powers is not going to reform itself and have urged lawmakers to require the ITC to apply a standard to import ban decisions that should be more (or fully) consistent with the eBay v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am by Neil Wilkof
The Board of Appeal even went on to state the evidence of lower sales might have been sufficient. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Commissioner assumed jurisdiction.In response to Eskridge’s allegations Bethpageargued that:Eskridge failed to properly serve Amanda Pirolo with a copy of her petition;  Pirolo’s name should be removed from the petition because she has not been employed by BOCES as a teacher of the deaf since 2012; Eskridge failed to name the current holder of the position, Paula Hastings, in the caption of her appeal and therefore she has failed to join necessary… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
The last is that of post-colonial and post-imperial national orders brought to its current state of expression in the bodies of states liberated from the formal domination of other states  a lifetime ago (measured by the life span of a human) and expressed through the magisterium of that is the constant state of oppression against which all national existence is gauged. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:13 am
• Regulation 1383/2003 does not fulfil the reasonability standard set forth in GATTArticle V:4. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Consider three Free Speech Cases the Supreme Court decided in the term that ended this past June: 1) In Holder v. [read post]
Dec. 18, 2009)(per curiam) (Whistleblower case remanded in light of decision, holding in State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
Mihir's post is set out below:Recently, the Supreme Court of India in Severn Trent Inc. v. [read post]