Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 5301 - 5320 of 10,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
To demonstrate a violation of Section 1983, a plaintiff must show that a person or entity, acting under color of state law, deprived him of the rights, privileges, or immunities guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States;2. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
Apple Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of California recently granted plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:41 am by Dan Hargrove
  In October 2010, Boston Scientific's subsidiary reached a settlement with the US Attorney in which the company agreed to pay the United States $600,000. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Including Bieniek (pictured), the campaign’s internal legal team numbers three, and all previously worked for James Bopp Jr., the Indiana lawyer who brought (and won) Citizens United v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
There also is the United States Coast Guard, which is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
Cat out of the Bag Miranda: "Saleh also argues that the March 26 . . . statements should have been suppressed under the ‘cat out of the bag' theory set forth in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
  But the Ninth Circuit holds otherwise, and reverses the grant of summary judgment to the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg, Joe Nocera argues that this week’s decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]