Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 7,403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
This, without more, does not satisfy the nexus requirement. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
Note that if a user clicks an “x” button to make the banner disappear, this does not mean that they are giving their consent. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
Note that if a user clicks an “x” button to make the banner disappear, this does not mean that they are giving their consent. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
This, without more, does not satisfy the nexus requirement. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 12:05 pm
For instance, a company can utilize a click through process (i.e. an “I Agree” or “I Accept” button), a pin number, a biometric measurement (i.e. fingerprint(s)), an “X” at the bottom of an email, or any other signature form. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:08 pm
For instance, a company can utilize a click through process (i.e. an “I Agree” or “I Accept” button), a pin number, a biometric measurement (i.e. fingerprint(s)), an “X” at the bottom of an email, or any other signature form. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
-X. [...]XI. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:44 pm
” (Our system of law does not require this. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:25 am
That’s really what it does. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:22 pm
I realize that many folks prefer smaller iPads, and Apple also sells a new 11” iPad Pro, which weighs a half-pound less and is 9.74” x 7.02”. [read post]
20 May 2023, 6:29 am
While I had no issues with the Italian and the German firms, I found the message on the Dutch firm’s website “[Firm] is pleased to announce that patent attorney and partner [X] is appointed as part time technically qualified judge” and “We are proud that [X] has also been appointed part time as a technically qualified judged for the Unified Patent Court in the [Field] sector. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 9:58 pm
Moore’s argument is based on the idea that an assertion that “x is good” if and only if “x is pleasurable” is a claim about meaning. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:57 am
V(1)(I)(4). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am
" Part III-A-1-a of the Health Experts' amicus brief (pp. 12-14), filed by Marcy Wilder and Hogan Lovells, offers a compelling explanation of why that's the case: I set out that explanation below. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
This post does not criticize or endorse that argument. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Of course, Dole does too, when recognizing the possibility that some particular spending condition “might be so coercive as to pass the point at which pressure becomes compulsion. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 10:49 pm
And sometimes when I talk to college professors -- and, keep in mind, I taught in a law school for 10 years, so I’m very sympathetic to the spirit of inquiry and the importance of not just looking at X’s and O’s and numbers when it comes to measuring colleges. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:35 am
Everything BP says and does is smoke and mirrors.. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
If you have additional income, credits or expenses to report, you may want to complete and submit a Form 1040-X, Amended U.S. [read post]
