Search for: "STATE v MILLER"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 5,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Such is the teaching of the First District Court of Appeal’s December 28, 2022 published opinion in Charles Jenkins et al v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
That brings us to the new NC case, State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
Brands, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
Trademark dispute between Easydate and EasyGroup (Class 46) United States US General Availability of client data on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google sinks trade secrets claim: Sasqua Group v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:08 am
Miller, 687 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:36 am
Tennesseeat LA Monroe- 4 1/234-3143-40WWJoe Craddock 22 of 29 for 401 yardsRutgersat Connecticut+324-2319-38LLRed Zone defenseis the differenceTulsaat Tulane- 6 1/240-3749-25WWTulsa offense goodbut defense weak Florida Stateat Boston College+ 6 1/230-2727-17WWNumber 2 team loses again Illinois atMinnesota- 1138-2144-17WWIllini punt only onceOregon Stateat USC+ 1520-373-24WW9 sacks by USC but no score in 2nd half Texas A&M atOklahoma+ 20 1/214-4414-42WWSam Bradfordthrows for 5 TDs South… [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
" "Harmful to minors" is similar to the community-standards obscenity test that the Court formulated in Miller v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm
Industries v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:56 pm
Buena Vista Water Storage District v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Black Brothers Co., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978), in Tincher v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
United States A federal judge in Maryland this week followed through on a previous warning to sanction a lawyer best known for representing Rep. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
