Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 8:10 am
Does this type of incident happen often? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:14 pm
This development strengthens the attorney's legal position in certain collection cases where the provision is contained in the engagement letter.Edward X. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 pm
I don't think it suffices to say merely that the Legislature has said X and hence the judiciary is powerless to change that. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
” I’m sympathetic to the arguments that FPL is making on liquidated damages, but I won’t speculate about how the Texas Supreme Court will finally rule. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
What are the X factors? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
What are the X factors? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:00 am
In response to the 2008 Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act requirement to test for lead in children's products, manufacturers have in some instances been screening products using hand-held x-ray fluorescence units, though the CPSC does not consider them to be effective for such testing. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:52 am
I don't care if the place does stink to high heaven. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
A problem I have witnessed, at least in my work, is that mediation is overly used and valued. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:47 am
McLendon's bill does not float theft levels with inflation, but instead sets a new felony theft threshold at $3,000, which would at least allow for several years of inflation before needing adjustment again.Until the fiscal note is published, we can't know for sure how many cases would be affected, but I suspect it's quite a few. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
I doubt that this is right; the First Amendment ban on religious decisions by secular courts should preclude slander or libel lawsuits that require evaluation of religious statements (e.g., “X is a sinner,” “X violated God’s law,” “X is not a true Christian,” etc.), but I don’t think the First Amendment should preclude such lawsuits based on ordinary secular assertions (“X had sex with… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:34 am
This does not excist but I just want to know if I am the only one who feels like this because of our children. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:18 am
The Plan does not mention electric transmission. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
****The question only makes sense (if it does at all) if you assume the default decision for a jury is “Guilty”. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
I know when to admit that I’m in over my head, without answers, sad and baffled. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:37 am
My response, to the extent that I recall, was something like, “Yes, it’s true that my paper presumes a certain definition of property law, and I think that definition is valid for X and Y reason, though if it were otherwise then the paper wouldn’t work. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:35 am
Does Church X now have an extra $500 available for Bibles, proselytization, and other clearly religious products and activities? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:55 am
One consistent annoyance, however, is that Mac OS X does not easily resize windows. [read post]
