Search for: "People v. Washington"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 6,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2022, 5:04 pm
” “Over the past year, the 6-3, far-right supermajority on the Supreme Court further gutted the Voting Rights Act, effectively overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:06 am
Kiobel and the 11 other Nigerian plaintiffs and one of the world’s largest oil companies spilled out onto the Washington, DC sidewalk. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
For example, in the 2016 Matal v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:16 am
Jonathan Turley is an attorney and a professor at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:01 pm
Beyer is cited in the following case: Weed v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 1:35 pm
But a bit of history is needed to appreciate that this is just Washington DC politics. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court refused to defend Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:05 am
For anyone familiar with Strickland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:16 am
General panels topics included Litigation and Legislative Updates; Tribal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:23 pm
Convention, Article V. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:04 am
The amendment process under Article V has followed a meandering path — in fact, the latest amendment, the 27th, dealing with congressional salaries and ratified in 1992, was actually one of the first proposed, in 1789. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:15 am
The Canadian Supreme Court also made the following clear, at paragraph 50 of a 2002 decision, Suresh v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm
Two things sent the legal technology industry into a frenzy.First, the Victor Stanley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
At its worst, unstable administration wrecks the rule of law and, eventually, people’s respect for government itself. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
I urge you to read US Federal Judge Rakoff’s opinion in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
No one. of course, plans to arrest people as they type happily away on their keyboards, but should the indictment against Lori Drew stand, the government will have the ability to do so should someone be disturbed by the product of people's computer.Lori Drew's lawyer, Dean Steward, has moved to dismiss the indictment, per the Wall Street Journal Law Blog and the Washington Post. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The correct answer is “Supreme Court decision in Young v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
