Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 5341 - 5360 of 5,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
Lett, and to join in similar opinions foreclosing relief in, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
In the courts Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch)  - Housing trust worker was wrongfully dismissed after he posted privately on Facebook that gay marriage would be an “equality too far” [case comments here and here]. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Obtaining an interim injunction in a defamation case has always been very difficult: if a defendant intends to defend the claim on the basis that what is published is true (or any other substantive defence), the court will not grant an interim injunction (Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269; Holley v Smith [1998] QB 726). [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Chris Silver Smith has looked at what could be a recent policy shift in Google’s longstanding informal policy of granting court-ordered defamation removal requests. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
 Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
” In dissent, Judge Daniel Collins concluded that those provisions were “inconsistent with the text of the CWA. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Judge will hand down judgment on costs on 17 September 2018. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am by Keith Lee
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
A federal district judge in Texas invalidated the rule and entered a national injunction against it. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am by Jon May
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]