Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 61,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2023, 12:59 pm
Which means there's a population density of 25 people per square mile. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:24 am
Case Citation: Will Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
Most states, however, including California, impose criminal liability on a person aiding and abetting suicide. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:40 pm
Much discussion of the Wickard v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:07 pm
Epps v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 2:18 pm
As Derek Muller noted over at the Election Law Blog, this could mean that Moore v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire & Cas. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:02 am
Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Horowitz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:34 pm
In Heller v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:14 am
United States, involving the meaning of Section 229 of the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
All of this suggests that performance of the State Auditor’s functions involves seeing “that the law is faithfully executed” within the meaning of Article V, Section 1 of the California Constitution. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:35 am
In Neill v. [read post]
