Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 5341 - 5360 of 15,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” Looking ahead to next week, Thomas Wolf at the Brennan Center for Justice offers “five things to get you up to speed” on Benisek v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm by Susan C. Morse
Instead, the majority looked to the interpretation of “a similarly worded criminal statute” in a 1995 obstruction-of-justice case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Gore in a majority opinion, and only one justice (Clarence Thomas) has cited to it in a separate writing; even then, the citation did not involve the merits of the Fourteenth Amendment claim.Finally, although the majority in Bush v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:14 pm by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Chief Judge Merrick Garland, Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson (joining remotely) and Judge Thomas Griffith reviewed the D.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Clarence Thomas has filed a dissent, joined by Alito. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere look at Justice Clarence Thomas’ dissent from denial of cert on Monday in Garco Construction v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:35 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In the 2015 case of Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Do you think Scalia would have signed onto Thomas’ dissent? [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s ruling in the famous Marbury v. [read post]