Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 9,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
” For several minutes, it looked like die deutsche ’Schaft was going to give the United States the shaft. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:25 am
The 2011 Wisconsin Act 23, a strict voter ID law, was recently challenged in the United States District Court located in Wisconsin. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
Jude Medical, Cardiology Div., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
From here, search for Cox v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
§1052(e)(4) a trademark that is primarily merely a surname cannot register on the Principal Register of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) absent a showing of acquired distinctiveness under §2(f), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has said no to the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild’s (ACCG) request to challenge issues previously argued in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
I’ve been thinking about the 1968 Supreme Court case of Hunter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
The motion is based on a little known United States Supreme Court case from 1971, U.S. v Marion. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Employment Div. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
It does not apply under all situtations and the United States Supreme Court has "recognized only limited circumstances in which the usual rule does not apply. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
United States, 636 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:53 pm
And it must not rely on overbroad generalizations about the different talents, capacities, or preferences of males and females as held in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Judge Moore’s rationale for the court of appeals in Michigan Catholic Conference v. [read post]
