Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:53 am
I could see this working. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:37 am
Alternatively, one person may have multiple avatars—if someone says “I’m the alt of X” they may or may not be. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
Law wants an analogy—it’s not really completely new, it’s kind of like X. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:41 pm
I think they would survive just fine without Title X, myself. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
The words “territorial jurisdiction” as used in this Article and in Article I of the present Treaty mean: territory, including territorial waters, and the airspace thereover, belonging to or under the control of one of the Contracting States; and vessels and aircraft belonging to one of the Contracting States or to a citizen or corporation thereof when such vessel is on the high seas or such aircraft is over the high seas. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:45 am
Does this make your more hesitant to rely upon a single provider? [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
I recommend that the Treaty be transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:58 pm
And it does not have to be done by the government. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
For example if D writes that “X told me that C is a thief”, D cannot escape liability by arguing that his statement was nothing more than a truthful description of what X had said to him about C. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm
I'll admit that when I saw the verdict form, I was puzzled as to how it would translate into a judgment, but I assumed that it reflected something that had either happened at trial, or might happen in the postverdict JMOL rulings that wasn't apparent to those of us who weren't in the courtroom - and it turns out that it did. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have signed this proclamation and caused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:37 am
It is also smart enough to recognize if you heard back, meaning that the other party responded to the email thread, and gives you the option of choosing whether or not to boomerang the message back in that event.This means that, if you send a DMCA notice (or any other email for that matter) and don’t hear back about it after X number of days, the message will be placed back in your inbox for follow up.This, I’ve found, has greatly simplified email tracking, in… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
Oh, No, everyone should have a hundred chest X-rays a year! [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
Daniel was detained on suspicion of drug smuggling, and an X-ray revealed that he had ingested no less than 116 sealed packages of cocaine. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:37 pm
Along those lines, she also encouraged us all to think, feel and work like a designer or to hire someone who does). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:28 pm
Does it follow that one is motivated to do X? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
X-Posted: Health Reform Watch. [read post]
