Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 521 - 540
of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 1:33 pm
Coupled with the destructive Citizens United decision of 2010, … Congress must respond. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:15 am
The WSJ gave Ralph Nader space for an op-ed damning the SCOTUS' recent decision in Citizens United: Last month, by a vote of 5 to 4, the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
21 Jan 2010, 9:10 am
The Citizens United majority doesn't have to squarely deal with this question - the issue is raised only indirectly - but it includes language that casts considerable doubt on this second-class status of broadcast TV and radio: Citizens United further contends that §441b should be invalidated as applied to movies shown through video-on-demand, arguing that this delivery system has a lower risk of distorting the political process than do television ads. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:02 am
"A Year Later, Citizens United Reshapes Politics": This audio segment appeared on today's broadcast of NPR's "Morning Edition. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:58 pm
Citizens United, with an assist from a 1976 decision Buckley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:41 am
The relevant question is whether Citizens United and its aftermath (namely, the decision in SpeechNow from the DC Circuit, and two FEC rulings) is responsible for the explosion of outside money since Citizens United. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:11 am
Weitzel (Davis Polk & Wardwell, Menlo Park, CA) has posted 501(c)(3) Charitable Organizations After Citizens United on SSRN. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
Aprill (Loyola-L.A.) has posted Regulating the Political Speech of Noncharitable Exempt Organizations after Citizens United on SSRN. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
Note the yahoo.news story on the Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court: Left and right united in opposition to controversial SCOTUS decision, which includes the text:A new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds that the vast majority of Americans are vehemently opposed to a recent Supreme Court ruling that opens the door for corporations, labor unions, and other organizations to spend money directly from their general funds to influence campaigns. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:10 am
Just got an e-mail that the Citizens United campaign finance case just came down. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:22 pm
” The second question asked about the political effects of the Citizens United decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:59 pm
So what might happen if the SEC doesn't propose rules requiring disclosure of political contributions? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
So what might happen if the SEC doesn't propose rules requiring disclosure of political contributions? [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
9 Sep 2009, 12:16 pm
The Court’s transcript is available here and audio is available here, courtesy of PBS’ the NewsHour. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:38 am
To sum up my views on the oral arguments today: we saw it coming. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:40 am
Major newspapers (including the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times) are reporting that United States Senator Charles Schumer (Dem., New York) has now introduced his bill intended to curb the effect of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in... [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 11:42 am
The premise of the campaign-finance/First Amendment connection is that spending money to support candidates (as expenditures and contributions) is a form of expression by the donors/spenders--expressing their support for the candidate, what the candidate stands for, and what he will do in office. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:49 am
Over at the Glom, Usha Rodrigues opines that: The shareholder protection rationale has real traction in the public company context, and I find Kennedy's reliance on the protections of shareholder democracy laughable .... [read post]
