Search for: "Brand v. Brand" Results 521 - 540 of 9,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am by Riana Harvey
With reference to JLR v Ineos Holdings (see IPKat analysis here), it was noted that an initial recognition figure of 32.5% was statistically significant. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:14 am by Aaron Marr Page
Which is somewhat troubling.Professor Brand does pick up on Chris’ comment that the case-specific exceptions ship has “set sail. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am by Paul Jacobson
Those other brands then find ways to promote themselves in connection with the same event, without paying the sponsorship fee and without breaking any laws.The UK Government/Intellectual Property Office:Ambush marketing generally occurs when one brand pays to sponsor a large-scale event (usually a sporting event) and a rival brand attempts to associate itself with the event. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The Schweppes Group holds the exclusive rights over the ‘Schweppes’ brand in Spain, among other countries, while the Coca-Cola Group holds the rights over the ‘Schweppes’ brand in the United Kingdom, among other countries. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
Paul then addressed innocent infringement defences in patent law, reviewing Schutz v Werit, but mercifully skipped trade marks since quite enough had already been said by other speakers on trade marks today. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:45 am by John W. Arden
As a result, the transaction is expected to close in June 2013.The case is U.S. v. [read post]