Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
As Defendant notes, the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion on the issue in Lively v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:58 am
Said the District Court: The clear underlying rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:06 am
Pauley denied (in large part) defendants’ motion in Ganek v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am
Today’s jabot choice is a reminder that many observers had perceived Ginsburg’s closing to her dissent in Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:31 pm
’” In its rationale, the Court relied heavily on two other juvenile cases, one of which hits close to home for Florida’s criminal defense lawyers: Roper v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:12 am
TBL Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
This morning the Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision (PDF here) in a strange case that many privacy scholars had watched closely, Sorell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
421 (1962); “Sunday closing” laws, McGowan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
421 (1962); “Sunday closing” laws, McGowan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
421 (1962); “Sunday closing” laws, McGowan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
OTS, the maligned, soon-to-be-closed thrift regulator, has always had broad preemptive powers and has used them. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Zhao v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 7:04 am
Vernum v Freyer 2021 NY Slip Op 50120(U) [70 Misc 3d 1218(A)] Decided on February 11, 2021 Supreme Court, Warren County Muller, J. describes a curious representation and ends with a split decision. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:06 pm
v=9RYcHiAAwoY [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:53 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:36 pm
This way of calculating premium overtime for salaried non-exempt employees has been the norm since Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
, 31 Suffolk U. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
The Supreme Court would adopt Leval’s transformative framing in Campbell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:33 am
Instead, courts should look closely at “[t]he facts and circumstances of each case. [read post]
