Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 521 - 540
of 12,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 3:16 am
Is Article 12(1)(a) of the E-Commerce Directive to be interpreted as meaning that in the circumstances of present case, Article 14(1)(b) applies mutatis mutandis to an injunction? [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:09 am
In conjunction with the White House commemoration of the seventh anniversary of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the EEOC announced on January 29, a proposed revision to the existing Employer Information Report—commonly known as the EEO-1 Report—to include collecting pay data from employers with more than 100 employees. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:44 am
This does not affect the concept of communication to the public or of making available to the public elsewhere under Union law, nor does it affect the possible application of Article 3(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/29/EC to other service providers using copyright-protected content.So, Article 17 would not change the law as it already exists under the InfoSoc Directive and as transposed at the national level: it would merely clarify it.This recital likely has the… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:26 am
Unlike the right of reproduction in Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive, in fact, Article 3(1) does not refer to the communication of a work "in whole or in part". [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court held that they are to be interpreted identically (case I ZR 29/18 at para. 43). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:03 am
., 2019-1238 (La. 1/29/20), So.3d _____. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Because of this lack of legal security claim 1 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step in the light of E1 and the new document E10.Reasons for the Decision1. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:03 pm
And if not then, there is Tuesday, May 29; after that, there are three more days in June (June 14, 21 and 29) for orders to be issued. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
He sought their return, their exclusion as evidence in his upcoming state criminal trial, dismissal of criminal charges against him and millions of dollars in damages.In Doe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:16 pm
See also id., at 28–29. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
As of September 29, 2016: 132 people with hepatitis A have been reported from eight states: Arkansas (1), Maryland (12), New York (3), North Carolina (1), Oregon (1), Virginia (106), West Virginia (7), and Wisconsin (1). 52 ill people have been hospitalized. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:08 am
Where does Cyclospora come from? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
§ 1002(1). [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:21 am
(29 C.F.R. section 785.47). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am
First, the bill does not define “non-technological. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Mar 29, 2010) (No. 1:09-CV-200-JVB). [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
” On July 29, 2020, a divided, 2-1 panel in the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in Allan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:33 am
Just two months before the effective date (January 1, 2023) of the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) Board met on October 28 and 29 to discuss revisions to the agency’s initial draft CPRA regulations. [read post]
