Search for: "In Re Phillips" Results 521 - 540 of 2,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2007, 12:43 pm
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips (Hat Tip: Lateral Link) But the Manatt "raise" has a catch. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:28 am
But Phillips never paid anywhere near that amount. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:03 pm by Charon QC
MEMORANDUM EYES ONLY To:  The Partners From: Dr Erasmus Strangelove, Director of Education, Strategy and Psyops RE: Retention of staff and human capital maximisation Gentlemen, 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:31 am by charonqc
PODCAST EPISODE 2: MUTTLEY DASTARDLY LLP – PROCURECO WARS MEMORANDUM To: The Partners From: Matt Muttley, Managing Partner RE: PROCURECO WARS Gentlemen, I write from our Caribbean island with news of an opportunity which I think we should give some attention to. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
Second question: is it defamatory to call someone a liar if they're actually telling the truth? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
You on have to show "reckless disregard" ("actual malice") when you're suing a public figure. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:14 pm
" The event marked Bay Area firms' signing, or re-signing, of a pledge to commit resources to pro bono services. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:36 pm by Phillips & Associates
If you’re suing your current employer, it may feel terrifying to contemplate taking the entity responsible for your livelihood to court. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 5:53 pm by Phillips & Associates
If you’re not being honest with your attorney or not communicating with your attorney, it could lead to problems that will harm your case. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:58 pm by Phillips & Associates
For example, if your boss finds out on Monday that you’re pregnant and, on Tuesday, sends you an email that says, “I just found out that you’re pregnant. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:31 pm
Not something you want on your resume if you're Manatt and/or Lee. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:04 pm
In re Basell, 547 F.3d at 1378. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm by Richard A. Epstein
In contrast, the burden imposed on Phillips for the exercise of his rights of religion and speech includes the loss of his business license, heavy fines and mandatory participation in various re-education programs suitable only in totalitarian regimes. [read post]