Search for: "Jeff Lipshaw"
Results 521 - 540
of 571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 6:46 pm
On the bright side, LePatner suggests that cyberspace's enhancement of "reputation nation" should make experiences like our guest Jeff Lipshaw's less likely in the future: [LePatner suggests] hiring experts who can monitor builders and who have financial incentives to prevent needless overruns. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:32 pm
This month we also have some familiar and new faces joining the Prawfs conversation: please welcome back Eduardo Penalver, Andy Siegel, Sam Kamin, Jeff Lipshaw, and Bill Araiza. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:09 am
Jeff Lipshaw, Law Review Submission for Satisficers: A Summer Placement Narrative, PrawfsBlawg, July 29, 2011. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:06 am
(cache)Instapundit (cache)Bainbridge on conservatives in the legal academy (cache)Law Crossing (cache)Paul Caron on Teaching Fellowships (cache)Daryl Levinson on the academic market (cache)Jeff Lipshaw - How Not To Retire and TeachEric Goldman - Bibliography for New Law Professors (cache)Madison on the Meat Market (cache)Madison on the process (cache)More from Madison (cache)Gordon Smith - So… [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:39 am
No doubt other friends (Jeff Lipshaw, are you out there?!?!?) [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
Jeff Lipshaw rightly observes that the facts in Ryan track Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:30 am
In a different comment, Jeff Lipshaw suggests that states could find ways to empower shareholders to determine whether expenditures for speech (election or otherwise) are permitted. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
" ] Jeff Lipshaw spoke about the difficulties of integrating a business understanding into the course. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 pm
Jeff Lipshaw of Legal Profession Blog chimes in at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 1:58 pm
Professor Larry Ribstein here, and here, as well as Professors Jeff Lipshaw (here) and Steven Davidoff (here and here) also have provided their analysis. [read post]
1 May 2010, 4:50 am
From this ignominious start, another lawprof, Jeff Lipshaw , connects the dots to Stanford Law School. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:18 am
Now that's really weird.Update 2: Heard from Jeff Lipshaw who, with tongue partially fixed in cheek (I think), mentioned something about people in glass houses. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:39 am
(For the TaxProf Blog take on Amir's article, see here; for Jeff Lipshaw's take at Legal Profession Blog, see here; and for the story behind my story, see here.) [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 12:14 pm
Jeff Lipshaw. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 3:10 am
I am most delighted to learn of the books that changed the lives of my good friends and mentors Ann Bartow and Jim Chen, as well as my Kindly Avuncular Law Prof Jeff Lipshaw. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:43 pm
Highlights thus far include: Larry Ribstein's insightful prediction (on Monday) that Bear shareholders might reject the deal; Gordon Smith's detailed discussion of the merger agreement's "restructuring efforts" provision; Steve Davidoff's consistently thorough and insightful analysis, including his most recent take on the deal protection provisions; and Jeff Lipshaw's expert thoughts on many different aspects of the deal. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:34 am
Update: there's a nice comment by Jeff Lipshaw to Lisa's post. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
" There has been lots of great commentary on the opinion: I'll crib from Larry and point you to Steve Bainbridge; Jeff Lipshaw; Gordon Smith; and Andrew Lund's paper on the subject. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 7:38 am
I have mentioned before that when I was twenty-five I looked like I was about eighteen, but when I walked into the courtroom, and said "May it please the court (I don't think lawyers usually used that form of address in the Ann Arbor District Court), Jeff Lipshaw of Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg appearing for defendant Global Scumbags, Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 1:52 pm
Update: Jeff Lipshaw reminds me of his excellent piece, How Not to Retire and Teach, which Dobkin clearly has not read... [read post]
