Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 521 - 540 of 634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:32 am by Ad Law Defense
Johnson and Nathan Archibald     As we blogged about recently, Defendants in the blockbuster Prop 65 case, Council for Education and Research on Toxics v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm by cdw
Superior Court,  2010 Cal. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
The dissent further argued that there was no reason to overrule Johnson. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
Nelson, of the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, conducted a Science Day, on March 7, 2017.2 Federal Talc MDL 2738 In the federal cases, Johnson & Johnson, one of the defendants, initiated the Science Day, in November 2016, when it asked Judge Wolfson to set aside a day in “which the parties and their experts can outline their positions/arguments regarding the medical and science issues at play. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:32 pm
* Two more breathy articles about the economics of domaining from the New York Times and Network World. 47 USC 230 * Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court, from the California Supreme Court: [A] shopkeeper does not have a duty to comply with the unlawful demand of an armed robber that property be surrendered…. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office)   Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]