Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 521 - 540
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Commentary comes from William Marshall at ACS Blog, Mark Kende at ACS Blog, Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Allen Ides in The Sacramento Bee, Amy Vitale in an op-ed at The Hill, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times, Stephen Henderson in the Detroit Free Press, William Astore in The Huffington Post, Tony May in an op-ed for Penn Live, Philip Martin in an op-ed at ArkansasOnline, Paul Rosenberg at… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences and Ilya Somin for The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, who remarks that “the legal battle over Trump’s travel ban is far from over. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:00 pm
”Such plea bargains play an important role in the prosecution of death cases.As Kent Scheidegger wrote in 2009, “More defendants plea bargain to a life or long sentence in states where the death penalty is available. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger agrees with the Court that “[t]he asserted justifications for searching the phone immediately without a warrant are weak,” but he adds that “[t]he Fourth Amendment should not be a ground for excluding evidence from a criminal trial unless the police acted in bad faith. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that “[i]f the status of the ‘dreamers’ is fixed by statute” in the meantime, “then this will be one more case for the mootness bin. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Lisa Soronen at the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Jim Harper at Cato at Liberty. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Woods v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
United States, where a defendant was convicted of violating Sarbanes-Oxley’s ‘anti-shredding’ prohibition by throwing illegally caught fish off his boat”; Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who summarizes the case as one in which, “[i]n a nutshell, the Court concludes that the federal prosecutors exceeded the power the statute gave them . . . and thus there is no need to decide whether Congress exceeded the power the Constitution’s treaty and… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the four criminal cases among the new grants. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
”At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger wonders why it took the court so long to deny cert without comment in two cases alleging racial disparities in the administration of Oklahoma’s capital-sentencing scheme, noting that one of the cases “was distributed for conference twenty-six times. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
Because of that voting pattern, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences observes, Justice Kennedy’s concurrence (joined by Justice Thomas) “should have a bit more clout than most concurrences, as Justices Kennedy and Thomas are necessary votes for the majority. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
The court's three decisions "indicate a desire to prune back the rules somewhat," Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a victims' rights group. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Crime & Consequences, to see what sort of lunacy Bill and his partner in crime, Kent Scheidegger, had cooking. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger “do[es] not see any plausible argument for retroactivity” in Edwards “[u]nder existing precedent. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
” At the blog Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger describes the argument in Greene – involving a question of timing under the federal habeas statute – as “[going] well for the State. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who argues that the critical question in the case “was whether private organizations with pro-defendant agendas … have the power to amend the Eighth Amendment so that states must follow their latest pronouncements, rather than their previous pronouncements, in deciding who qualifies for the no-matter-what exemption,” and that on “this essential point the Court hands us a bowl of… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, here and here. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger summarizes the criminal cases in that sitting. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
However, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences laments the lack of objective standards for determining threshold levels of attorney negligence, and he urges the Court to issue a clearer test for the issue next Term. [read post]
