Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 521 - 540
of 624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
” Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime & Consequences on the court’s refusal to exercise its original jurisdiction to consider the dispute, agreeing with Justice Clarence Thomas, who dissented from the order, that the court’s discretionary approach to these cases may violate the Constitution. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm
------------------*Kent Scheidegger disagrees. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:12 am
Unfortunately, party-pooper Kent Scheidegger, co-blogger with Otis, points out in the first comment that the list is a meaningless scam. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
Ann Richards oversaw 50 executions during her one term - and unlike Perry, she never commuted a death sentence.The irony here, points out Kent Scheidegger of the pro-death-penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, is that Texas does not deserve its reputation as the most execution-prone state. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
” Nonetheless, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, is “particularly interested in knowing whether Ms. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
Kent Scheidegger – The “cause and prejudice” rule is a corollary to the exhaustion rule. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Kent Scheidegger – The starting point here is to remember what a drastic measure it is to overturn a judgment for ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
Kent Scheidegger on Crime & Consequences looks at the consequence of replacing Kennedy in criminal cases; he does “not expect that the Kennedy-Whomever succession will come close on the Richter Scale to the Marshall-Thomas succession on matters of criminal law. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
The ruling Wednesday "should put an end to the de facto moratorium on the death penalty caused by legal challenges to this method of execution," said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a nonprofit group that supports the death penalty. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences took a contrary position last week. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:17 am
"There hasn't been any major falloff," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which takes a conservative stance on penal issues.And:Haney's findings were consistent with those of last month's Field Poll of the California electorate, in which 67% of respondents expressed support for the death penalty.The professor queried 800 jury-eligible Californians in February and March for his survey. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the week ahead at the Court. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Jonathan Adler at the Volokh Conspiracy, Ed Whelan at Bench Memos, and Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences all take note of Hurley’s story and the overrepresentation of the Ninth Circuit on the Supreme Court’s docket. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation immediately fretted that any moratorium, de facto or otherwise, would dilute deterrence and "cause more innocent people to die".It is, of course, beyond the realms of ridiculous to think that criminals who have until now been reining in their murderous impulses, will have read the court's ruling and, with a sigh of relief, decided they can now go on killing sprees. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the four criminal cases among the new grants. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, here and here. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that “[a] broad attack on supervised release revocations would indeed be a grave concern,” and that although “[t]he direct effects of [yester]day’s decision are not severe, … future developments warrant monitoring. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
” At the blog Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger describes the argument in Greene – involving a question of timing under the federal habeas statute – as “[going] well for the State. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger laments that in Banister the court “took a small step further down a road it has already traveled too far–bogging down federal habeas corpus cases by making them more like regular civil litigation in federal courts. [read post]
