Search for: "Moore v. Proper"
Results 521 - 540
of 629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Moore, No. 07-3770 Sentence for convictions on federal drug charges is affirmed over defendant's equal-protection argument that he was a "class of one" subjected to a federal mandatory-minimum sentence, whereas similarly-situated defendants charged in state court faced no such minimum. .. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Tony Moore, also appears to have believed that Ti818 was the preferred PET resin. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
And in Moore v The President of the Methodist Conference (Appeal No. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
That would be a proper balance. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held, in Haas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:06 pm
Philips v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
of Cal. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Moore, 403 Ill.App.3d 147, 160 (2010). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm
See also, Moore v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
., Moore v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Professor Lorna Woods raises the question of whether Sky is a “fit and proper person” to hold a broadcasting licence, on the City Legal Research blog. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:33 pm
Cir. 2012) (Moore, Rader & Aiken (D. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
