Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 521 - 540
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (12), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier is terminated, revoked or otherwise barred from participation in a State Medicaid program or any other Federal health care program. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
In Parker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Parker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
Powledge Unit in Palestine, Texas. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
See also Parker v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
The Debtors filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Chapter 7 Case"). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
In Thomas's world, the residential segregation in the United States and educational segregation that follows it have been the product of purely private choices. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 5:54 am
The Court held that the rights afforded under the state Constitution were more protective of individual freedom from arrest than under the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
The LCD states the following: “Evaluation of the clinical literature indicates that studies comparing the efficacy of CTPs to alternative wound care approaches with patients’ autologous skin are limited in number, apply mainly to generally healthy patients, and examine only a small portion of the CTP products available in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm
Parker. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:56 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
CMS states in the new Final Rule that it will publish further rulemaking to expand this reporting requirement after assessing the progress of its initial phased-in approach. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
CMS states in the new Final Rule that it will publish further rulemaking to expand this reporting requirement after assessing the progress of its initial phased-in approach. [read post]
