Search for: "People v. Li" Results 521 - 540 of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Lawson, 677 F.3d 629, 650 (4th Cir. 2012) (stating that the court is “troubled by Wikipedia’s lack of reliability”), Bing Shun Li v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:36 am
There were more like those.In Li, the threat issue is pretty straightforward because he emailed people and told them he was going to kill them. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:01 pm
As regular readers know, China Law Blog loves the Danone-Wahaha dispute, having written the following posts on it: -- China's Joint Venture Jeopardy -- Danone v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
I find that people who listen to judges express their personal views on important questions that the courts are looking at, that they have a sense that the judge is coming into the process with a closed mind, that their personal views will somehow influence how they apply the law. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:42 pm by ACLU
v=wfqUk0tdjkgUsing people’s names and pronouns is a matter of respect. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKReal PropertyCourt Rejects Facial, as-Applied Constitutional Challenges to New York's Lis Pendens Statute Diamond v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:56 pm
” Mahāvīra, Sutrakritanga 1.11.33. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
A horrible set of facts confronted the First Department yesterday in People v Dickerson, 2007 NY Slip Op 04718 where the Court had to decide whether the starvation constituted depraved indifference murder, or criminally negligent homicide. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 am
Sarka Truneseck SUFFOLK COUNTYFamily Law Court Grants Wife's Motion to Vacate, Cancel Lis Pendens Filed Against Home by Husband Ricca v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:56 pm by Jim Walker
 You will see that there have been many more than 16 people who die during cruises each year. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:43 am
"  In this excerpt, Loftus describes her testimony in a pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]