Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R" Results 521 - 540 of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
This is Part I of VII of a brief recap of some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided in the past few months: I. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm by Michael Froomkin
The panel was Judge R. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
 However, it's always pleasant to be asked for one's opinion.The first in this recent brace of references is Case C-117/15 Reha Training Gesellschaft für Sport- und Unfallrehabilitation mbH v Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA), a request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) in a case that involves a rehabilitation facility. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Some Background Reading I’ve previously published a number of posts on the lower court decisions in Pappas and on other key decisions that may influence the outcome in Pappas: Read here my June 2008 report on the First Department’s Littman v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As the record makes clear, the Title Reports were riddled with indicia of fraud-a fact that was only discovered by FTF after the Loan’s closing (see Pltf 19-a 11 25, 31; Defts 19-a 11 48·52; Rodak aff ,i,i 24-25). [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
Michael Sadgrove, Woolgathering in North East England:Assisted Dying: “Compassion is not a Crime”: “I hope to be able to make the decision, while I am of sound mind, to ask, if I need it, to be helped across that final threshold with dignity and grace. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
C’est l’objet de la première partie dont l’approche transversale conduit à dégager les grandes lignes : elle révèle un tronc commun qui traduit l’unité de la matière et permet de mieux en comprendre l’esprit. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm by NL
of the FAQ, released today (1 September) now reads as follows (in bright red): 3.2 I am concerned that I will not be able to deliver all the matter starts that I have been allocated, what should I do? [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm by NL
of the FAQ, released today (1 September) now reads as follows (in bright red): 3.2 I am concerned that I will not be able to deliver all the matter starts that I have been allocated, what should I do? [read post]