Search for: "Speed v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 4,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
The post FTC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:01 am
“The justices tackle partisan gerrymandering again: In Plain English” [Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog, earlier on Gill v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 5:52 am
Additional Resources: Perry v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
As reported by Illinois Review, yesterday, with the backing of all parties, an Illinois state trial court judge dismissed as moot the complaint in Darby v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:28 am
In Brown v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 2009 NY Slip Op 01753, Decided on March 12, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentChristine A. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:59 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 60 AD3d 1184Christine A. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:07 am
Writing for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the effect that the Court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 11:56 am
The case arose when a state trooper followed the defendant’s vehicle and activated his lights to stop the defendant for driving five miles over the speed limit. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:42 pm
(Read the high court’s opinion in Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:51 pm
According to the complaint in Maynard v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Olen Goins v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:55 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:15 am
Most recently, the Georgia Court of Appeals held in McCobb v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
The appellants in these matters seek to challenge the Secretary of State’s paper ‘High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future—Decisions and Next Steps’, which set out the government’s strategy for a national high speed rail network called High Speed Two running from London to Birmingham, Manchester, and Leeds. [read post]
