Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2021, 9:14 pm
This post summarizes criminal decisions released by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on April 16, 2021. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:53 am
If you would like to learn more about criminal forfeiture in federal criminal cases, check out this article. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
It’s possible that a fix to the jury instructions would have sufficed to solve the problem, and the Florida Supreme Court already issued an alert — even before the bill was enacted — that the self-defense instructions “are currently under review by the Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases because of recent legislation or case law. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:09 am
That doesn’t make it criminal, but that’s usually a determination made before grand jury presentment or at trial. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:56 pm
Cogan and Jacobs will likely take the opposite approach, poking a few holes in the prosecution's case (like with the chart of Citizens' Alliance Fumo tried to take apart on the standard) but generally sticking to their themes of intent and criminality. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:34 pm
” And Justice Sonia Sotomayor, perhaps the Justice who is the most protective of the rights of criminal defendants, jumped in quickly when Justice Scalia suggested that the meaning of the jury instructions was so clear and “such common sense that there is a maxim” about it. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:00 pm
After a 3 week trial, a jury convicted them of criminal CAN-SPAM violations, criminal obscenity for 2 spammed images and other charges. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
These summaries, prepared by Phil Dixon (Smith) and Jeff Welty (Rahimi) will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 pm
based standard set out in [Utah Code] section 76? [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:52 am
The McKittrick policy directs Department of Justice attorneys who prosecute Endangered Species Act (ESA) cases to request jury instructions that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant knew the biological identity of the animal taken. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
While most discussion has centered on the jury's split verdict on the criminal charges, the unexamined issue in the case is why Snipes had not paid his taxes in the first place. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
ABA Criminal Justice Standard 3-3.9(a) states, “A prosectuor should not . . . permit the continued pendency of criminal charges in the absence of of sufficient admissible evidence to support a conviction. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
The district court was therefore reversed in full and the case remanded with instructions to consider appointment of counsel for the plaintiff and to permit discovery on both claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:31 am
One of the most confusing aspects of a New York criminal case for defendants and suspects to navigate is the procedural rules that apply. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:42 am
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:03 am
The Court granted the State's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this Dallas County capital murder on the following issue: Criminal jury charges contain "law applicable to the case," and often "defensive issues. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:15 pm
The Supreme Court on Monday will hand down dozens of cert. denials in criminal and capital cases. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
We will have to wait and see, but there is a strong chance that in future sensational criminal cases we will see a return to what used to happen, generally, 20 years ago and more. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Frias, No. 06-5381 Conviction and sentence to life of imprisonment for conspiracy to commit murder in connection with a narcotics offense is affirmed over claims regarding: 1) insufficiency of the indictment; 2) erroneous jury instructions; and 3) various sentencing errors. . [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Regarding past medical expenses, the jury was instructed to award damages in an amount that would compensate Yanez for “the reasonable cost of reasonably necessary medical care that she has received. [read post]
