Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 521 - 540 of 8,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder and Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
§1254a(f)(4), which states, “for purposes of adjustment of status … [the TPS holder] shall be considered as being in, and maintaining, lawful status as a nonimmigrant. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
 must be interpreted as meaning that the holder of an intellectual property right over goods sold to a person residing in the territory of a Member State through an online sales website in a non-member country enjoys the protection afforded to that holder by that regulation at the time when those goods enter the territory of that Member State merely by virtue of the acquisition of those goods. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  In Purcell v Ireland, the Commission (in an admissibility decision) upheld a reporting ban on Sinn Fein accepting – as with the majority in Holder - apparently somewhat speculative justifications for the ban. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:16 am by Blog  Editorial
On the 4 July 2012 the Supreme Court had a further hearing in the case of O’Brien v Ministry of Justice. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed that copyright holders must consider whether a use of material is fair before sending a takedown notice. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Anna Christensen
Holder (No. 09-60), that a second or subsequent conviction on a simple drug possession charge is not an “aggravated felony” for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) when the state conviction is not based on the fact of a prior conviction. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:48 am by Florian Mueller
Two SEP holders have recently been awarded royalties by the High Court that fell far short of their demands (InterDigital v. [read post]