Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 521 - 540
of 7,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm
Cascades Computer Innovation v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:05 pm
…The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm
The plaintiff brought a declaratory judgment action against the defendant patent holder in Washington. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:47 pm
v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
Supreme Court case in Golan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
That trend began with the Supreme Court’s decision last Term (United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:36 am
The case, Lakewood Chiropractic Clinic v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 10:22 pm
In the Ericsson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
Holder (11-135), and Khalid v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 1:21 am
Effects An asymmetric choice of court agreement has different effects upon option holder and non-option holder. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am
In November 2020, the Dusseldorf Regional Court decided to refer to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) two sets of legal questions: one about the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs) and another about the application of the Huawei v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Han v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Even former United States Attorney General Eric Holder recently expressed his belief that marijuana “ought to be rescheduled. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:06 pm
Holder, No. 01-cv-01854 (D. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Some important take-away points from the majority opinion Satisfying a compelling state interest: When it comes to denying a First Amendment expression claim owing to a finding of a compelling state interest, that, too, is quite rare — Holder v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am
Two days later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will finally hold its postponed (due to Hurricane Ida) hearing in Continental v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:15 am
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Sony Supply Chain Solutions (Europe) BV, formerly Sony Logistics Europe BV (Case C-153/10); [2011] WLR (D) 130 “A person who made customs declarations in his own name and on his own behalf could not rely on a binding tariff information of which he was not the holder, but which associated company on whose instructions he made those declarations. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am
Chief Justice Morrison Waite In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Here is an interesting case from Missouri: In Rodgers v. [read post]
