Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:26 am
PatentsActavis v ICOS - NetherlandsLast year, IPKat reported on the UK Court of Appeal decision Actavis v ICOS [2017] EWCA Civ 1671, in which the concept of "obvious to try" for a particular dosage regime was assessed in the context of clinical trial data. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
Arguments and facts on which a party intends to rely are "front-loaded", which is certainly not the case with large-scale litigation before the High Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
As a rule of thumb, James found that the shorter the length of the coexistence, the wider the scale of the coexistence would need to be for it to be successfully relied upon. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 1:12 pm
The new law will also require that all employers provide a pay scale to current employees upon request, and that employers with more than 15 employees provide a pay scale in all job postings, including those posted by third parties. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:30 am
Millions of people use such media to inform others about the status of their lives. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:31 am
On 11 August 2020, the Court of Appeal (CA) handed down its judgement in the case of R (on the application of Edward BRIDGES) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
S. 500, 515 (1964), in turn quoting Scales v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm
The factual matrix of the case is important – factors such as the scale of publications (including print runs and estimated readership) and the gravity of the statements themselves (according to the meaning attributed to them). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm
The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:22 am
Washington State Department of Revenue (Business and Occupational (B&O) Tax Refund – Agency Law) News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html In the Environment & Energy section, we feature an article about how the United Nations will scale up consideration of the experiences of indigenous peoples with climate change and efforts to respond to it. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Berman and Euclid also combine awful reasoning with vast harm inflicted on millions of people, combined with facilitating large-scale racial exclusion and what James Baldwin called "Negro removal" (see Parts III.B-C). [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
"The 2019 annual democracy report of the V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg found that the U.S. under Trump was among the world's liberal democracies experiencing "democratic erosion" (but not full-scale "democratic breakdown"). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” At Claremont Review of Books, Hadley Arkes maintains that if Justice Anthony Kennedy “is truly willing to carve out a space for the people who bear reservations about same-sex marriage, he could be taking the step that begins a critical scaling back in the reach of the Obergefell case. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court declined to review a death penalty case, Elmore v. [read post]
