Search for: "Turner v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Historical footnote: I chaired the first ever CPD training session on intellectual property for solicitors, at the Queen Mary College IP Unit, on Day 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Turner & Co., who sought to protect “EXCELSIOR No. 1 Peruvian Guano” for use in connection with fertilizer. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
.], the board filed a 237-page response in State Supreme Court that denied Mr. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax treatment of dual-income earners in a family comes from social and legal assumptions the tax code makes when evaluating the nature of taxable units. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Considering the previous judgments in Marc Rich, van Uden and Turner as well as the civil law approach of the Regulation, the West Tankers judgment does not come as a surprise. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]