Search for: "US v. Crawford"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
” Williams v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
It shouldn’t have come in; it’s hearsay, and it’s testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm
Jan Crawford reports: Mr. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
The DOJ lawyer, Dana Lydia Kaersvang, answered yes — and mentioned Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:01 pm
From this story by Jan Crawford:----------------------------------------------------------------The issue arose when a lawyer for the Justice Department began arguing before the judges. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:27 am
Knepper v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
Remember, just because a statement falls within a hearsay exception doesn’t mean it survives a Crawford analysis, and just because it’s an excited utterance doesn’t mean it falls within the “emergency” analysis in post-Crawford decisions… Good decision from the 9th in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:14 am
This is also supported by Texas case law in the 1987, Texas Supreme Court case, Crawford v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
US-based lawyer Stephen J Easley recently reported on a session at the South by Southwest Interactive Festival panel in Texas, “Can You Tweet That? [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm
Guests: Lawrence Norden: New York University Law School, @BrennanCenter Hans von Spakovsky: Heritage Foundation, @HvonSpakovsky Jon Husted: State of Ohio, @OhioSOSHusted Jonathan Chait: New York magazine, @jonathanchait Hilary Shelton: NAACP, @HilaryOShelton Links: CalTech/MIT on voter registration and its effect on turnout 1984 NY Grand Jury report on voter fraud, Election Law blog on Von Spakovsky on voter fraud in New York Crawford et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm
v=wall Twitter: @rep_stevewomack Congressional District 4 Rep. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
She provided these items to Officer Crawford, explaining that she believed this was the laptop used by [Schuler] to write the letters. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
France… It was a Crawford violation to allow the State to have a state trooper testify as to the urine results, rather than the toxicologist or lab technician who performed the test, the 4th District holds in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
" * Crawford requires unavailability and a prior chance to cross-examine for the use of testimonial hearsay. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
-Bridget Crawford Feminist Law Professors [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
