Search for: "United States v. Cleveland" Results 521 - 540 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Calk had hoped then-President Trump would name him to a powerful government post, including treasury secretary, defense secretary, or ambassador to France or the United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
Federal Election Commission, and filled in some new details about the behind-the-scenes maneuvering that led to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
It's ironic that, even as we see the federal government assert its authority over local affairs in legislation such as PPACA and cases like United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:57 am by Brett S. Krantz
” A recent decision in the state of Ohio should cause all independent firms to re­examine the true value of a Swiss verein structured entity (RevoLaze, L.L.C. v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]