Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am
In Dahlia v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Retrobrands USA LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:19 pm
The case, First Unitarian v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 3:10 am
On 30 April 2019, in Kablis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:21 pm
Browne in Kourtesis v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:37 am
Relying on Harris v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:42 am
State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Readers who wish to dig more deeply into this issue may be interested in the following cases: United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Readers who wish to dig more deeply into this issue may be interested in the following cases: United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:09 pm
Ferguson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a recent decision in R. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
For illustrative purposes, this book considers the key phases of jury trials (opening statements, direct and cross-examination, closing arguments and voir dire) in the light of a particular case: United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:03 pm
A few closing thoughts. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
You talk about your interests. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 9:12 am
There are a few state specific issues addressed in the report but the vast majority of it will be of interest to readers from other jurisdictions. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm
Until 2013, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in a case called Shelby County v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
However, there are a few interesting points to note:ReputationAlthough Zuma only has one restaurant in the UK, its international fame and celebrity clientele was sufficient to establish that the ZUMA marks have a "substantial reputation in the UK" for the purposes of section 10(3) Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
19 May 2022, 11:04 am
I've linked to a few of his write-ups, and today I saw him again in the vey same place and courtroom where he achieved great results for Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 2:28 am
Haier application of Huawei v. [read post]
