Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 5381 - 5400 of 39,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm
., homeless) can't, and won't, comply with the onerous requirements we put on them, doesn't that just seem a little wrong? [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
Inserting pop culture references or funny little asides into opinions doesn't always work for me. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:48 pm
But Y.R. eventually wants more money, so gets an attorney and makes a formal child support claim.The trial court discusses the equities, makes a support order, Y.R. appeals, and the Court of Appeal remands.That's the legal part.But it's a juicy little private affair, right? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
But I'd bet my left foot that the police got there really quickly after chasing the guy at 100 mph for a little over a mile, and even if the guy testified that he intended to call in the accident (which he didn't), I'd bet my entire set of feet on the fact that he wasn't telling the truth and that he deliberately fled in a (continuing) attempt to get away.But, hey, at this point, Part III is unpublished, and -- as I noticed at the time -- the guy's… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:18 pm
  (All for naught, I might add.)Given that you know that a criminal defendant has a right to appeal, maybe the prosecution putting in a little more effort below might make rational sense. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:59 pm
 Since a different rule would make little rational sense. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:15 pm
So how to balance the relevant interests.Like I mentioned, most courts had said, okay, there's a global pandemic, so we're going to do things a little differently, but still, people were allowed to actually witness the trial. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:10 pm
The rule justifying the devaluation of minority shares in closely held corporations for their lack of control has little validity when the shares are to be purchased by someone who is already in control of the corporation. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
That rule likely comes out of the pirate days, and okay, I can get on board for it.But, here, the facts seem a little different. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
  The trial judge decides not to reduce the restitution award for comparative negligence, so orders Julie to pay the full amount of the victim's medical bills:  a little under $100,000.All of that makes sense. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:20 pm
 But when that's the actual offense, I think it's a little strange to say that you were armed with the firearm during the offense. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
 Judge Christen, by contrast, adopts that same controlling principle -- the plurality's -- but nonetheless writes separately to state that dissenting opinion should never be evaluated when deciding which rule to follow under Marks.So there's still a fight about how to interpret the case.Oh, and in a neat little coincidence, guess how many judges on the Ninth Circuit panel agree with the approach articulated by Judge Paez, and how many agree with the approach articulated by… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 2:38 pm
Sometimes I can shorten an opinion by summarizing it, or add a different perspective, or offer a little critique of an argument. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:07 pm
 But that's a little to arbitrary for me.And what we have is only slightly qualitatively different. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
  Or at least that to call him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt seems a massive stretch.You've got little to no actual "evidence" that a crime occurred. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
  And maybe, as described, a little surprising. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 12:32 pm
Here's a neat little hypothetical that you might discuss in a class on criminal law. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 7:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
 [Honduras] [Habitual residence] [Petition granted] In Lopez v Ash, 2022 WL 3328888 (W.D. [read post]