Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 8,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 11:08 pm
Most recently in 1972 when rents were capped for a short period as a counter-inflationary measure. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:54 am
In short, it is a Living Constitution whose changes are effected in many and diverse ways. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am
That was the message of National Transportation Safety Board Chair Mark V. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:10 am
The Supreme Court assumed that following its decision in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
I taught a short course in this at the University of Georgia Law School. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
There has already been an interesting case challenging Illinois divestment legislation (National Foreign Trade Council v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:01 am
Similarly, the sovereign immunity revolution was all about saying that some people could not sue wrongdoers because of an imagined history that went beyond the text of the Constitution (Alden v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
In short, because of the events of World War II with its ethnic destruction, h the international human rights framework aimed to treat all people equally. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:27 am
"But at the end of the day, it's very difficult when you have a crowd of 6,000 people, and there is an element in that crowd that wants to voice their opinion. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
Jonathan Zittrain’s case study on Facebook’s contagion experiment to the course as a short writing exercise. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
The right to appeal is a statutory right and it can be circumscribed by the conditions in the grant ..............The purpose of the Section is to act in terrorem to make the people comply with the provisions of law. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:24 am
Jordan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” This follows directly from New York v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
Asylum claimed it had the right, under the First Amendment, to make a movie about ancient Indonesian people and refer to a name commonly used to describe the short-statured ancients in its movie title. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:55 am
Souza v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
