Search for: "Matter of Brown"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 8,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” Cohan gives no indication that he contacted Brown for comment.Nifong faults Linwood Wilson(!) [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
Alvarez, 132 S.Ct. 2537 [2012]; Brown v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
Browning Editor’s note: The following story is reprinted with permission from the Fall 2013 Texas Entertainment and Sports Law Journal. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
It is, of course, one thing to valorize King as the apostle of non-violent change; it is quite another to suggest, for example, that John Brown, let alone Nat Turner, be studied as a possible role model. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
They too rejected the “truth of the matter” rationale and would have found that the forensic report was indeed used for the truth of the matter it asserted. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:27 am
Brown. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:46 pm
[para. 51] [76] Despite Abella and Brown JJ. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
Brown, 2003-Ohio-5059 (“There is no bright-line test to determine what constitutes an irreconcilably deadlocked jury. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
Anyone who wishes to understand the matter further can read about it there. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am
The judge held that the claimant did have such legitimate reasons – although he indicated he had “not found this an easy matter to decide”, which is judge speak for “I had discretion to go either way and there was not much in it”. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
I am satisfied that he took into account relevant matters, did not misunderstand the facts, and certainly understood the law. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:45 am
That foundation matters a lot for the resolution of the current CNIL case against Google. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Attorney–Client Privilege In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Suski reinforces the Court’s precedent that arbitration, as a matter of consent, cannot be imposed on parties who have not agreed to arbitrate their disputes, and that courts “may not devise novel rules to favor arbitration over litigation. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Attorney–Client Privilege In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:33 pm
Under this test, the subject matter of the recent protests constitutes one of “public concern. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
Dunn, 262 P.3d 1268 (Wyo. 2011) (attorney received public reprimand for failing to file timely governmental claims notice and complaint); In the Matter of Brown-Williams, 2012 WL 366587 (Ga. 2012) (attorney received public reprimand for missing statute of limitations in workers' compensation case). [read post]
