Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 5421 - 5440 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Gutierrez 13-347Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Center for Civic Mediation and LA County Bar are presenting a program tonight on the law of arbitration: "Will California Arbitration Law Survive the United States Supreme Court?" [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
Rejecting the notion that applying the general FLSA regulation for reimbursement of travel expenses on top of the specific H-2A rule would render the latter superfluous, the Ninth Circuit revived a claim for immigration and travel expenses brought by H-2A workers whose expenses in procuring employment and traveling to the United States dropped their pay below the minimum wage (Rivera Rivera v Peri & Sons Farms, Inc, November 13, 2013,… [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United Cellular, Inc.: In this case, the EEOC claimed the employer discriminated against a Seventh Day Adventist by refusing to accommodate his religious request to not work from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:57 am by Ron Miller
 In United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, the Second Circuit found that the former general counsel of a diagnostic lab violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct by his participation in a qui tam action under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) based on allegations his former employer’s pricing structure perpetrated a fraud against the Medicare and Medicaid programs. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
John Fund, Inc. 13-317Issue: (1) Whether this Court should overrule or substantially modify the holding of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]