Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 5,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Most recently, in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Environmentalists and labor unions look upon these agreements with increasing alarm, and may respond by launching a constitutional attack. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Specifically, Section 889(a)(1) prohibits executive-branch agencies from initiating procurements or entering into contracts for certain telecommunications equipment or services from companies associated with, owned by, or controlled by China (part A), that are to be used “as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system” (part B). [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
Pablo de Greiff (Colombia; since 1 May 2012; on Special Rapporteurs, see Fact Sheet N° 27: Seventeen Frequently Asked Questions about United Nations Special Rapporteurs). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
” [Washington Post] “‘It is also our understanding that roughly two dozen boxes of original presidential records were kept in the Residence of the White House over the course of President Trump’s last year in office and have not been transferred to NARA, despite a determination by Pat Cipollone in the final days of the administration that they need to be,’ wrote Gary Stern, the agency’s chief counsel, in an email to Trump lawyers in May 2021, according to… [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Lobbying the executive branch, for example, is not considered lobbying for tax purposes and so is not subject to the lobbying limits. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm
The Minnesota Judicial Branch maintains a useful handbook, as well as an informative video, for prospective jurors, here. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
On the other hand, that may just be what they want you to think. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
On the other hand, that may just be what they want you to think. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm
The Minnesota Judicial Branch maintains a useful handbook, as well as an informative video, for prospective jurors, here. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
Kwon v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Hopefully, this document will shed some light on this little known function of our legislative branch. [read post]