Search for: "Goldstein "
Results 5421 - 5440
of 5,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 5:05 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in the case. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in Michaels. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on amicus briefs filed in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
., to Department of Agriculture decisions holding that § 192(a) and (b) does not require a showing of injury to competition.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of 55 Farming, Ranching, and Consumer OrganizationsPetitioner's reply (forthcoming) Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being grantedTitle: Gangi v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:36 am
Recent LexBlog Q & A posts: Nick Holmes, legal publishing consultant with infolaw and author of Binary Law [2.5.08] David Maister, law firm practice consultant [2.4.08] Steve Matthews, search engine optimization specialist and founder of Stem Legal [2.1.08] Tom Goldstein, partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and founder of SCOTUSblog [1.30.08] Rick Klau, former VP of publisher services at FeedBurner and current member of Google's content… [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
(Lyle Denniston and Tom Goldstein both recapped the argument Wednesday on this blog.) [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
[Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 11:00 am
The longest uninterrupted opening remarks were from Thomas Goldstein in Air & Liquid Systems v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am
[Disclosures: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Lane and was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Schuette. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
(Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Loughrin, but the author of this post operates independently of the law firm.) [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Tom Goldstein, over at SCOTUSblog, has flat-out declared that “[o]n October 4, 2010, Elena Kagan will ask her first question as a Supreme Court justice. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:35 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County 16-466 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:31 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:07 am
Indeed, in a recent decision, Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 1:33 pm
(Tom Goldstein opines here; Richard McAdams here; Orin Kerr here). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
