Search for: "Christians v. Christians" Results 5441 - 5460 of 5,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2025, 4:41 pm by Chris Castle
  ARI Comment in IPO Consultation v F 2Download [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Even when some gains appear to have been made, as Sari Graben and Christian Morey note regarding the definition of “Aboriginal title” (p. 287) in the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia, the Crown retains the “potential for infringement … [if the] title lands can be used for large-scale infrastructure or resource development deemed to be in the public interest” (p. 302). [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Rafaelʹ Lemkin : radi︠a︡nsʹkyĭ henot︠s︡yd v Ukraïni : statti︠a︡ 28 movamy. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by John Bursch
  In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:24 am
A copyright debate: "Is NLA v Meltwater the end of browsing? [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
  Even many non-Christians and atheists object to the homosexual agenda. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:16 am
 A somewhat more recent Philosophy & Public Affairs paper by Christian List and Philip Pettit succinctly discusses some of these issues. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Indeed, these laws were reactions against the Supreme Court's 1990 ruling in Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:00 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, August 9, 2019 Tags: Capital formation, Innovation, Investor protection, IPOs, Public firms, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Finalized Volcker Rule Amendments Posted by V. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm by Adam Wagner
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:56 am by Brian E. Barreira
  The persistent vegetative state was an important issue in the 1990 United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:04 pm by Katherine McKeen
” Although all four of these justices seemed skeptical of Ramirez’s argument, Justices Alito, Roberts, and Thomas joined the majority in Burwell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
For example: The Moderates; Swedish Democrats;  and The Christian Democrats have all put forth such motions. [read post]