Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 43,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 3:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued the following order today in State of Washington v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Conard v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:25 am
In some states, such a finding will bar a claim completely. [read post]
1 May 2016, 3:56 pm
However, as Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:58 am
" That's a pretty hefty record. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm
Bank v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm
In Kucharski v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:43 pm
This fact motivated a district judge in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:10 am
Judgment, U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am
United States, Judge Kavanaugh will be more open to a Fourth Amendment that protects digital records and property. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:59 pm
Productions v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:59 pm
Productions v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
The records also revealed that there was no data collected from the phone between 7:09 a.m. and 7:46 a.m.: the period when the robbery was in progress.Bryant v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
- my 2008 talk at Georgia State University on UGC legal issues. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
