Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 44,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 10:42 pm
On August 7, 2008, the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Edwards v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:48 pm
The constitutional violation still persists, as the state itself acknowledges,’ ” he said. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 12:15 am
Comm'n v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
I'm still working on my posting on Whorton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
There is still more commentary on Monday’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
In upholding the Gwinnett County Trial Court's denial of the certificate, the Georgia Court of Appeals hinged its interpretation of Davenport v State (2011) through the lens of Layfield v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:09 am
The landowners said a new route would still cross the Ogallala Aquifer and affect most of the landowners on the originally proposed XL route, yet TransCanada will get a quicker review from the state than it would have gotten from the federal government. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Further, it castigated the RCMP, stating, “There is also a disquieting fact that, on the record before us, it seems that the authorities were much quicker to intervene to protect Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:55 am
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:47 pm
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
Still, the court’s analysis is cogent, well-cited, and persuasive. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
After mentioning a number of authorities, it stated that the test of dishonesty was that clearly explained by Lord Hoffman in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37 at [10]: [emphasis added] Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:16 pm
The post on May 3, 2010 explained that defendants in Ohio O.V.I. cases do not have the ability to challenge the general reliability of breath testing machines at trial due to the holding in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:21 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:44 am
The Court has previously held that ratcheting is still required post-Booker when district courts are departing under the Guidelines, United States v. [read post]
