Search for: "State v. Still" Results 5441 - 5460 of 44,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 8:09 am by Alan Ackerman
The landowners said a new route would still cross the Ogallala Aquifer and affect most of the landowners on the originally proposed XL route, yet TransCanada will get a quicker review from the state than it would have gotten from the federal government. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:54 am by Carolyn Elefant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had to say in Public Citizen v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Unfortunately, insult prosecutions still continue today, but the Court has remained steadfast in protecting offensive political expression under Article 10; such as the Court’s 2012 opinion in Tuşalp v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Still, the court’s analysis is cogent, well-cited, and persuasive. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
After mentioning a number of authorities, it stated that the test of dishonesty was that clearly explained by Lord Hoffman in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37 at [10]: [emphasis added] Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Well, Broadway is still dark this week, and it seems the judges of the New York Court of Appeals don't want the courts of the Empire State to do much work either -- at least not the sort of work that entails thinking hard about whether litigants who put their medical status in issue need to consent -- under HIPAA -- to informal interviews of their treating physicians by opposing counsel, conducted under New York discovery rules.A tip of the hat to Eric Turkewitz, who wrote… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:38 am by A
Thankfully, everything was backed up (I'd also been using that for the new Animal History Museum) but it's still been painful getting back up to speed.Anywho... just saw this morning in the ISBA Digest e-clips that the state supreme court granted a petition for leave to appeal in this matter yesterday:Toftoy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:32 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Divorce"While the states are still arguing whether or not to even allow gay couples to get married, the first wave of same sex couples looking to divorce are making their way to the courts. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:39 pm
The district court entered a consent judgment, stipulated by the parties, stating the defendants' products did not infringe under the district court's claim construction of several terms, but that the plaintiff could still appeal the claim construction.The Federal Circuit vacated the decision and remanded the case because the judgment lacked vital information as to whether there existed a controversy upon which the court could rule. [read post]