Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 5441 - 5460 of 19,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Scalia writes, for instance, that he has little use for a central precedent the Obama administration has cited to justify the health care law under the Constitution’s commerce clause, Wickard v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 11:44 am by Florian Mueller
In Munich, that includes the determination of collateral (bond or deposit to be provided if an injunction is enforced during an appeal) and the application of the Court of Justice of the EU's Huawei v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 10:53 am by Neil Cahn
This might also be written: P = (V-M)/2   The First Department noted that the lower court, New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew F. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Only the previous day, he had joined the opinion of the Chief Justice for the Court in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc v President and Fellows of Harvard College 600 US (2023) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia) in which Roberts CJ held that race-based admissions programs did not survive strict scrutiny. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
A number of cases decided last Term are still generating headlines. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
The anti-abortion protesters who appealed to the Supreme Court suggested that the Justices strike down the Massachusetts law, or if necessary, reconsider and perhaps overrule Hill v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
This week marks the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
” The justices agreed to hear oral argument next term in Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm by Christine Corcos
(The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by both houses of Congress in 1972, and Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
And while McDonald doesn’t purport to discuss what standard of review courts should apply, it might still affect the matter. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 7:44 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
ZTE, but the Orange-Book case law of the German Federal Court of Justice is rejected. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
(Oxford University Press, 2008), page 2] In Canada, the prohibition against lawyers being employed to provide services to the customers of their employers[ii] can be overcome by a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms “public freedom for access to the courts” argument based upon s. 2(b)’s, “freedom of opinion and expression”; see: Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1), 1983 CanLII 1707 (ONCA), 41 O.R. (2d) 113; plus an extended use of, Endean v. [read post]