Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 5441 - 5460 of 6,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Scott Harshbarger and Dennis Aftergut
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:05 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
United States, that is more of a constitutional problem than directly regulating. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:44 pm by Jon
This has been on my to-do list for a long time, so I finally did it, and you can see the result, Draft bill proposing amendment to Texas Constitution for establishment of a state grand jury for the review of the constitutionality of the actions of United States government officials and agents, and to authorize state grand juries to investigate public administration.It is posted on the Tenth Amendment Center site at… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court questions whether lawyers, of which the United States has no shortage, provide more social utility than scientists, engineers, and inventors. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm by Jacek Stramski
That Petition is before the Court in Florida House of Representatives, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
” First, the court found the first part of the test satisfied because “state-provided education is ubiquitous throughout all but the earlier days of the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
(“Dick”) Schmidt, was General Counsel for the United States Information Agency (USIA). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
” To see if sexual abuse is “widespread” within the Catholic Church, why not consult a source even the Catholic Church’s own lawyers would find credible: the report by John Jay College  researchers commissioned by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, “The Causes and Context of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950-2010. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Or should they not be reported until the accrued dividends are actually paid out (which may, in the case of restricted stock units, occur after the vesting date)? [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
A mention in this regard may also be made of the developments in the United States and United Kingdom where this right has had [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
§§ 1257, 1291, 1292, or any other provision of law, neither any federal appeals court nor the Supreme Court of the United States shall have jurisdiction, either by appeal or as an original action, over any case in which reimbursement is sought for expenses allegedly incurred in conformity with rules established by a SIMAB. [read post]