Search for: "Does 1 to 10"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 42,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
Per the Court: “[T]o concede that substantial evidence supports the applicability of the Class 3 and Class 32 exemptions on this record, thereby putting the proposed project within a class that presumptively does not have an effect on the environment, is to concede, in effect, that there is no feature distinguishing it from the exempt class. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Answer #1 No. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:41 pm
” Id. at *10 (text added). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:10 am
Therefore, the 2007 – 2008 Policy does not provide coverage for the Bates claim. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
Had it done so by investing funds in risk-free, index-linked gilts it would have £4.5bn more in its pension fund than it does. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:52 pm
For employees who are current employees before October 1, 2013, employers must provide the Exchange Notice no later than October 1, 2013. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:35 am
The range did not therefore result from an arbitrary selection.The range indicated in claim 1 was also narrow compared to the possible range for the device shown in figure 1 of E1.The range had to be appreciated also in combination with feature 3 of claim 1 which recited: "an electric power storage device (20) connected to the terminals in parallel with the fuel cell". [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 1:43 pm
Over the years we grew to 11 partners, 3 counsel, 10 associates, and a paralegal. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:44 am
Or does it just seem so? [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
After recalling why droit d'auteur traditions have been traditionally wary of fair use, he explained why things have somehow changed: (1) civil law has moved to more open norms; (2) authors right systems have been moving away from natural law arguments to justify copyright protection; (3) fair use is not unpredictable [but it is not so widespread either: see map]; (4) fair use does not conflict with the Berne three-step test. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:58 am
The IRS claimed that it was within the 10-year statute because the limitation period was suspended for 241 days during the pendency of the collections due process hearing, as directed by Code §6330(e)(1). [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:38 am
That approach continues to build on both the bedrock principles under which our current system has operated and the over 30 years of New Jersey precedent interpreting the Canons.Thus, as does the ABA Model Code, the Committee's proposal contains Canons that express general principles of conduct followed by rules that prescribe specific standards of conduct.As to the amendments proposed within this rulemaking, most of those are technical in nature, either eliminating cross-references to… [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:32 am
Not quite 1 in 5 high-risk patients with heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) died on conference days, but 1 in 4 died on days when there was no meeting. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:22 pm
The forecast shows 169,890 deaths in the US by October 1, with a possible range between 133,201 and 290,222. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:56 pm
The Act maintains seven (7) income tax brackets but lowers the income tax rates to 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37% from 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35% and 39.6%. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
As Tim Cleary [the Hearing Officer in that opposition] said: "Notwithstanding the fact that the Opponent did not formally abandon the other grounds of opposition, namely those under Sections 6(1), 8(1)(b), 8(3)(b), 8(4)(a), 10(1), 10(3), 10(4)(b), 37(2) and 42(2) of the Act, I am satisfied that there is no need for me to give them any serious consideration [that's NINE grounds of opposition, raised for no good reason]. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #10 It depends. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
Id. at *10 (citation omitted)." [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am
In this decision the Board of Appeal is annoyed about the fact that a Rule 140 Correction of a decision of the Examining Division (signed by the whole division) and a Rule 139 Correction of an obvious error (signed only by the primary examiner in the opposition period, i.e. after grant; G 1/10 stopping this process was not yet issued) are not in the public part of the file.The Board sees the R.139 correction as not valid since no formally correct decision is taken; it would require… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:31 am
Louis criminal defense attorneys at Brinkman & Alter, LLC have been taking care of criminal charges in Missouri for over ten (10) years. [read post]
