Search for: "In Re United States"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 43,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 11:59 am
What they all share, along with the United States, is a near-identical ruling class of transnational managerial elites who believe they alone possess History’s mandate to reengineer society. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of Caifornia. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
Kitty Block is CEO of the Humane Society of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether an individual who owes on a student loan may wipe out a portion of the debt in a bankruptcy without showing that the debt posed an “undue hardship. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:55 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1370, 1380 (Fed. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
How should DACA employees prepare who are inside the United States? [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
Maine, Montana and New Jersey have all instituted warrant requirements for police to access this information and I fully expect other states to follow suit before the 84th Texas Legislature re-convenes. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:02 pm
The United States has wrestled with these issues for a long time, and much of its constitutional jurisprudence reflects this drive toward constitutional harmony between theory and practice. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 8:14 am
In the SWF context this is particularly important given the great liberal democratic project of the Great Recission of 2007 to re-imagine the SWF as an autonomous actor and thus a legitimate institutional investor authorized to project domestic public funds into other states and markets (subject to its core principles of course but that was never the issue in the context of sanctions).7. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
In this post, we share with you some great news for Somalian nationals under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada is considering whether the dispute should be heard in Canada or the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:20 pm
Enlarge / United Nations HQ in New York. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
While more U.S. states will consider marijuana legalization in 2018, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) remains steadfast in refusing registrations to cannabis-related marks, when the goods or services will violate the federal Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
While more U.S. states will consider marijuana legalization in 2018, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) remains steadfast in refusing registrations to cannabis-related marks, when the goods or services will violate the federal Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
Among other things, he pointed to an 1897 statute that states, “[T]he laws of the United States enforced in the territory shall apply to all persons therein, irrespective of race. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:55 pm
In case you're wondering about the Constitution, the relevant clause is Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2: No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.So all Kucinich needs to do is start inhabiting Washington by election day. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:32 am
Because the arbitration plan was illusory and Nelson was not bound by the agreement, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the Northern District of Texas’ order compelling arbitration and remanded the case. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:22 am
Data Privacy Framework United States – Executive Order 14086 United States – Statement from U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
First, I was surprised and, yes, disappointed to see the stingy position taken by the Solicitor General's office in this case: "In the United States’ view, 'counsel is not constitutionally required to provide advice on matters that will not be decided in the criminal case,' though counsel is required to provide accurate advice if she chooses to discusses these matters. [read post]
