Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 5461 - 5480
of 61,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 12:34 pm
Which in turn means that there's no way that the California Redistricting Commission -- which uses the federal census data -- can do its job by the statutory deadlines.Normally, the Legislature would just pass emergency legislation that extended the deadline. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
Does Data Scraping Violate Federal and State Law? [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 1:17 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:51 am
[7] West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:33 am
Dennis Crouch Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
” Cone v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
These cases are reviewed below: People v Newton, 2007 NY Slip Op 03754 - "No Means No" The defendant was charged with, inter alia, sodomy in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40[3]). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Typically, training of new soldiers, sailors, and so on is designed to toughen up the soft and weak recruits into a “lean, mean, fighting machine. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am
That left only the state Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:51 am
Sanders (1964) and Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Further, the second dozer was listed as a “1977 or 1980 rental unit”, presumably meaning that if the 1977 described was not accepted then Sureway would rent a 1980 unit to meet their obligations (para 13). [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am
” This observation, one of my favorites in the widely taught United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
Here is a copy of the opinion (Van Buren v U.S.) [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Lopez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
In State Treasurer v Snyder, No. 298554, the Court of Appeals held that an incarcerated defendant did not have the right to disclaim his interest in his mother’s life insurance policy in order to avoid having it seized by the state. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:51 pm
Compare, for example, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
Jackson and its 1977 ruling in Brewer v. [read post]
